Skip to contentPricing for the company answering the questionnaire
Choose the AI review path before the deal stalls.
NoticeKit is primarily for SaaS teams receiving AI security questionnaires and buyer review threads, not for the buyer sending them. Start with inventory when the vendor facts are messy, use Starter or the builder when one answer is blocking the deal, move to Pro when the same questions keep coming back, and use the audit when the thread needs judgment instead of more copy. The free builder now also gives you a send-ready reviewer note, a downloadable 20-question matrix CSV, and a portable JSON draft export, so you can test the workflow seriously before buying. Use the route chooser first if the blocker is still fuzzy, then buy the smallest package that fits the job. Keep the older subprocessor workflow secondary for notice or evidence operations.
Pick the blocker, buyer language, and next step below. The picker points to the fastest route plus one backup path so the buying decision stays tied to the live review problem.
One answer now. Use it for a single live response block and a clean handoff.
Pro
Repeat review. Use it when the same questions keep coming back and files need to stay reusable.
Concierge Audit
Blunt 48-hour read. Use it when the thread needs proof prioritization or a safer next move.
Inspect the exact bundle first.
The sample bundle shows the answer block, reviewer note, the full 20-question matrix, proof checklist, internal handoff, reviewer workspace export, and answer-bank draft before checkout.
Use this when you want a blunt 48-hour read on one AI, security, privacy, or public trust path before you decide what to fix. You get the top gap, the best fix path, and reply-ready guidance for the live thread.
If vendor facts are still messy, start with the inventory workspace. If one live answer is blocking the deal, use the starter pack or builder. If repeat review is the real job, move to the answer bank or Pro kit. If you are only comparing options, open the kit preview before checkout.
Proof gap before pricing gap.
If the buyer is already challenging proof, owner, or review metadata, fix that first. The evidence map usually tells you faster whether free tools are enough or whether the thread really needs Starter, Pro, or an audit.
If the buyer already calls it due diligence, use the buyer-language route.
When procurement, security, or counsel is asking for vendor chain, framework notes, approval owner, or escalation path instead of just one answer block, route them into the dedicated due-diligence template and scorecard before pushing them back through the older risk-checklist wording.
Stripe collects the buyer email at checkout. Starter, Pro, and Concierge Audit purchases are sent by email during early access, and the next-steps page shows the exact handoff, delivery email, and audit intake details before you buy. The audit reply comes back with the gap priority, fix path, and reply-ready guidance for one live review thread.
Keep the buying decision simple: Starter gets one answer moving, Pro helps repeat review, and Concierge gives you a human async pass when the thread needs judgment instead of another template.
Starter
One answer now
Copy-ready AI questionnaire wording, browser-only draft tools, answer prompts, and the shortest path from vendor facts to a response you can send today.
Pro
Repeat review
Reusable answer-bank files, matrix support, proof links, and packet-friendly exports for the same questions that keep coming back.
Concierge
Async review
A 48-hour async read of one AI, security, privacy, or public trust path, with blunt next steps and no call required.
Pick the route by blocker.
Start with inventory first when the stack facts are still scattered. Use the starter pack or builder when the live buyer thread needs a copy-ready answer, and move to repeat review when the same prompts keep returning. Keep broader handoff and the older notice workflow secondary.
One answer now
Starter pack + builder
Best when the buyer is waiting on one clean AI answer and your team needs the shortest path from vendor facts to copy-ready wording, a send-ready reviewer note, 20 reusable follow-up answers, and one downloadable local bundle for the next buyer thread.
Best when the blocker is still the vendor story itself and your team needs providers, regions, owners, proof links, review notes, and a quick readiness score before drafting the answer.
Best when the reviewer wants the vendor chain, workflow scope, framework mapping, approval owner, review date, and escalation path in one place instead of a shorter answer-first route.
Best when the blocker is the agent control boundary itself and the buyer wants the exact tools, read-versus-write actions, approval stops, service-account scope, and audit trail.
Best when the buyer already has the answer wording and now wants the supporting proof assets, owner, review date, approval path, or internal control-reference notes behind it.
Best when the reviewer names OpenAI directly and you need a concrete answer today, a reusable source file for the next repeat review, or a quick route choice between the two.
This is the main NoticeKit path now. Start with the inventory workspace when the vendor facts are still messy. Move to the starter pack when one live AI answer is blocking the deal. Use the answer bank or Pro kit only when repeat review pressure is real. Everything else should support one of those three jobs instead of competing with them.
Use the supporting AI routes only after the main job is clear.
These paths stay available for named vendors, examples, comparisons, broader packet work, and stack context, but they should support the core route rather than replace it.
Named vendor
OpenAI template + answer bank
Use the named-vendor route when the reviewer asks specifically about OpenAI and you need a concrete answer or reusable source file without drifting back into generic AI copy.
Use these when the buyer thread narrowed down to autonomy, write access, approval gates, service-account limits, or auditability instead of a generic questionnaire answer.
Use these when procurement or counsel now wants the fuller vendor chain, sample packet, or broader AI review map after the core answer path is already clear.
Use these when you need the concrete vendor list and stack context around OpenAI, Vercel, Stripe, Supabase, and PostHog before the buyer review answer gets finalized.
If your real problem is customer notice timing, objection windows, page cleanup, or evidence tracking around a vendor change, use the older subprocessor tools instead of forcing the AI review path.
Consultants, fractional DPOs, and startup attorneys can use the partner preview and founder handoff pages to qualify referral-only, client-delivery, or white-label fit before sending a partner request.
The kit preview shows the AI questionnaire Starter and Pro manifests, free assets you can inspect first, and how manual early-access fulfillment works without exposing the paid bundle.
Starter handles one answer now, Pro adds repeatability and operating files, and Concierge Audit gives you a 48-hour outside read before the thread gets messier.
Starter is enough when
You need one buyer-ready answer, not a full operating system
The blocker is one live deal thread, one workflow, and one reviewer ask
You mainly need wording, proof prompts, and a clean handoff path
Pro is worth it when
Different customers or contracts need different answer variants
You need owners, approvals, and proof across repeat reviews
Procurement or counsel expects a reusable operating record
Want to see the workflow before paying?
Use the free answer builder to create one copy-ready response, one send-ready reviewer note, 20 reusable follow-up answers, a reviewer workspace export, an answer-bank draft, and a portable JSON draft export, or open the starter pack if you still need the shortest route into the right AI review asset before buying Starter or Pro.
The review brief builder turns a messy vendor change into one concise note with the facts, owners, blockers, and open questions a reviewer needs before the change goes live.
Ask for a free async teardown with one live page, one workflow, or one buyer blocker. It is the lowest-friction way to get a specific answer before buying Starter, Pro, or a paid audit.
Short answers for buyers deciding whether NoticeKit fits their workflow, including the due diligence route when procurement uses that wording first.
Is this legal advice?
No. NoticeKit provides operational templates, draft language, checklists, and tracking fields. Your counsel should decide whether a notice is required and whether the final wording fits your agreements.
Where is data stored?
NoticeKit's public tools run in your browser and do not send form inputs to NoticeKit servers. Some tools can optionally autosave drafts on your device with localStorage, and paid kit files are designed for your own workspace, drive, or ticketing system.
How should attorneys use it?
Use NoticeKit to prepare the workflow facts, named vendors, answer wording, reviewer notes, and packet handoff before attorney review. It should reduce cleanup work, not replace counsel.
What if the buyer calls it due diligence?
Use the due diligence template, scorecard, and framework map when procurement wants the vendor chain, workflow scope, approval owner, review date, and escalation path in one packet. Keep the evidence map nearby if the thread is really about proof assets or control references.
Proof you can inspect now
No verified customer quotes are published yet, so buyers can inspect the working files and manual handoff flow instead of guessing at proof we do not have.
Preview
See the kit manifest
Open the buyer-facing preview to inspect exactly what ships in Starter and Pro before checkout.
NoticeKit templates organize operational facts and draft language. They do not determine whether your DPA, privacy commitments, or applicable laws require a specific notice.