Review brief
Use this to hand the current state to procurement, privacy, security, or counsel without rewriting the same facts again.
Use this scorecard when your SaaS team is answering a buyer AI due diligence request and the blocker is still the operating facts. Capture the vendor chain, workflow scope, customer impact, training stance, approval owner, proof links, and framework notes once, then get a readiness score, gap list, and the shortest next NoticeKit route without sending your inputs to a server.
This scorecard is for the SaaS team receiving buyer procurement, security, privacy, or counsel review pressure, not the buyer sending the questionnaire. It is operational packaging, not legal advice.
Use this to hand the current state to procurement, privacy, security, or counsel without rewriting the same facts again.
Use this to tighten the scorecard before you jump into a final answer or paid packet route.
Do not build the wrong artifact too early. Use the score to decide whether the packet still needs fact cleanup, proof packaging, one answer block, or a broader repeat-review file.
The vendor chain, scope, framework notes, proof, or owner path is still too fuzzy. Keep working in the scorecard, use the template, or request a teardown before drafting the answer.
The facts are mostly there, but one or two weak spots can still create buyer follow-up loops. Use the due diligence starter pack or evidence map once the missing items are patched.
The facts are tight enough for the answer builder, repeat-review answer bank, or a broader packet path if procurement already wants more than one response block.
Use the evidence map when the remaining blocker is proof quality, named owner, review date, or framework-reference detail behind one claim. Use the due diligence starter pack when the live blocker is still one AI questionnaire thread. Use the answer builder when the facts above are strong enough for a copy-ready response. Use teardown if one page, one vendor, or one customer segment still needs an outside read.