Framework brief
Use this when the buyer wants one document that connects the workflow facts to governance and review notes instead of another short answer paragraph.
Use this local framework map when the buyer thread has shifted from one answer block to governance coverage. Capture the named vendor, workflow boundary, owner, evidence, NIST AI RMF notes across Govern, Map, Measure, and Manage, plus a lightweight ISO/IEC 42001 operating map for ownership, controls, and improvement before procurement, security, privacy, or counsel review stalls the deal.
This page is for the SaaS team answering a buyer review. It helps package one workflow against common framework-shaped prompts without pretending to replace a formal certification, management system buildout, or legal review.
Use this when the buyer wants one document that connects the workflow facts to governance and review notes instead of another short answer paragraph.
Use this to close the missing owner, proof, control, or improvement notes before you send the packet or buy the audit.
Keep the framework language practical. The buyer usually wants evidence and ownership, not a long control catalog.
Use the NIST fields to explain who owns the workflow, what the system touches, how it is checked, and what controls or remediation path exists if risk stays open.
Use the ISO-oriented notes to show there is a named owner, a control objective, a monitoring cadence, and a follow-up path when the workflow changes.
If the buyer really only needs one response block, use this map to clean the facts first, then route back into the due diligence starter pack or the builder instead of writing a giant framework packet.
NIST AI RMF 1.0 organizes AI risk work around Govern, Map, Measure, and Manage. ISO/IEC 42001:2023 defines requirements for an AI management system. This tool uses those official labels as a lightweight buyer-packet scaffold, not a substitute for the full standards.
Use the due diligence template if the buyer mainly wants the packet shape. Use the evidence map if the blocker is proof quality behind one claim. Use the due diligence starter pack or answer builder if the live job is one sendable answer. Use the audit if the missing piece is judgment about what to fix first.